Intravenous fentanyl during shoulder arthroscopic surgery in the sitting position after interscalene block increases the incidence of episodes of bradycardia hypotension / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Episodes of bradycardia hypotension (BH) or vasovagal syncope have a reported incidence of 13-29% during arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the sitting position after an interscalene block (ISB). This study was designed to investigate whether intravenous fentanyl during shoulder arthroscopy in the sitting position after ISB would increase or worsen the incidence of BH episodes. METHODS: In this prospective study, 20 minutes after being in a sitting position, 160 patients who underwent ISB were randomized to receive saline (S, n = 40), 50 microg of fentanyl (F-50, n = 40), 100 microg of fentanyl (F-100, n = 40) or 30 mg of ketorolac (K-30, n = 40) randomly. We assessed the incidence of BH episodes during the operation and the degree of maximal reduction (Rmax) of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). RESULTS: The incidence of BH episodes was 10%, 15%, 27.5% and 5% in the S, F-50, F-100 and K-30 groups, respectively. Mean Rmax of systolic BP in the F-100 group was significantly decreased as compared to the S group (-20.0 +/- 4.5 versus -6.3 +/- 1.6%, P = 0.004). Similarly, mean Rmax of diastolic BP in the F-100 group was also significantly decreased (P = 0.008) as compared to the S group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that fentanyl can increase the incidence of BH episodes during shoulder arthroscopic surgery in the sitting position after ISB.

Effects of intraoperative continuous infusion of low dose remifentanil and intravenous bolus dose of fentanyl on postoperative pain

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether continuous infusion of remifentanil during propofol anesthesia could produce opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) and whether an intravenous bolus of fentanyl could control OIH in the management of postoperative pain. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine women undergoing gynecologic surgery were randomly divided into four groups. Group C: nitrous oxide and propofol infusion (3-4 microg/ml, n = 40), Group F: propofol infusion and intravenous bolus administration of fentanyl (1 microg/kg) after suturing the peritoneum (n = 40), Group R: propofol and remifentanil infusion (2-4 ng/ml, n = 40) and Group RF: propofol, remifentanil infusion and intravenous bolus administration of fentanyl (n = 39). Patient controlled analgesia was started after the operation. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) was measured in the recovery room, then at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after the operation. RESULTS: The VAS scores for Groups R and F in the recovery room were lower than for group C (P < 0.05), but there were no differences 2 h after the operation. The VAS scores for Group RF 6 h and 12 h after the operation were higher than those for group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that low dose (2-4 ng/ml) continuous infusion of remifentanil during propofol anesthesia does not produce marked hyperalgesia. However, an intravenous bolus of fentanyl can aggravate OIH induced by remifentanil.

Effects of intraoperative continuous infusion of low dose remifentanil and intravenous bolus dose of fentanyl on postoperative pain

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether continuous infusion of remifentanil during propofol anesthesia could produce opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) and whether an intravenous bolus of fentanyl could control OIH in the management of postoperative pain. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine women undergoing gynecologic surgery were randomly divided into four groups. Group C: nitrous oxide and propofol infusion (3-4 microg/ml, n = 40), Group F: propofol infusion and intravenous bolus administration of fentanyl (1 microg/kg) after suturing the peritoneum (n = 40), Group R: propofol and remifentanil infusion (2-4 ng/ml, n = 40) and Group RF: propofol, remifentanil infusion and intravenous bolus administration of fentanyl (n = 39). Patient controlled analgesia was started after the operation. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) was measured in the recovery room, then at 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after the operation. RESULTS: The VAS scores for Groups R and F in the recovery room were lower than for group C (P < 0.05), but there were no differences 2 h after the operation. The VAS scores for Group RF 6 h and 12 h after the operation were higher than those for group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that low dose (2-4 ng/ml) continuous infusion of remifentanil during propofol anesthesia does not produce marked hyperalgesia. However, an intravenous bolus of fentanyl can aggravate OIH induced by remifentanil.